Thursday, November 25, 2010

Re: Shadow over Asia - John Mauldin's Outside the Box E-Letter

The other side of the theory of QE2 (thats why in Chinese)

http://www.zaobao.com.sg/yl/yl101126_001.shtml

"低估"人民币是中国给美国的福利

(2010-11-26)


美国联邦储备委员会宣布推出第二轮量化宽松货币政策,到2011年6月底以前购买6000亿美元的美国长期国债,闹得举世哗然。中美多年的"货币战争",也由此发生逆转。

  长期以来,一直是美国攻击中国操纵币值,并试图联合世界主要经济大国,形成围剿人民币的货币联盟,以压迫人民币升值。这一策略虽然并未得手,但美国占据了"道德高地",处于攻势。但是,联储的这轮新政,则使这一潜在货币联盟顷刻破解,甚至给中国制造了"反围剿"的机会。除了印度一家支持美国外,德国、巴西,俄罗斯等主要国家都加入中国的行列,激烈批评美国不负责任的货币政策。德国财长则说得十分具体:美国一方面说中国操纵货币,一方面自己印钞票压低美元,两者难以协调。言下之意,美国是在贼喊捉贼。这也难怪,到了20国集团会议上,奥巴马致信各国首脑请求终止"货币战争",已经完全处于守势。

  不过,美国的这种货币政策并非为了给中国解围,而是服务于美国的经济利益。根据《经济学家》的分析,美国的第一轮"量化宽松"货币政策,使联储在2009年初到2010年初自印钞票购买了1兆7500万亿美元的自家债务。在这次的第二轮"量化宽松"政策下,自印钞票所购买的自家债务也许将达到1万5000亿美元。这大大降低了国债息率,刺激了投资,并压低美元价值,进一步刺激出口。从现在美国的经济状况看,这样大肆印制钞票并没有导致急剧通货膨胀的苗头。所以,至少从短期看,如此印钞很好地服务于美国的利益。既然是自己的钞票,此时不印更待何时呢?

  但是,这种政策给中国这类巨大的外贸盈余国家带来了严峻的挑战。因为美元是国际货币,中国人辛辛苦苦创造的外贸盈余都换成了美元。这笔钱拿到手后如果不立即花掉,那么就会随着美元的贬值而不停的缩水。如果像现在这样用来购买美国的国债,联储自购债务的行为也压低了国债的生息率,在中国持有的资产中不停地灌水,造成中国方面的损失。在这种局面下,美国怎么都是赚,用不着太担心人民币被低估。

人民币低估好像给美国免息贷款

  诺贝尔经济学奖得主加里·贝克尔(Gary S. Becker)不久前在《华尔街日报》撰文指出,被低估的人民币,实际上是中国送给美国的大礼。首先,这种被低估的人民币,使美国能够以便宜得多的价格购买中国产品。不仅如此,当中国靠着出口这样的廉价产品而创造了大量的贸易盈余时,得到的不过是写在纸上的资产,即美元和以美元计值的金融证券。这些纸上资产,几乎是没有利息的。这就好像中国给美国贷款不收利息。

  《华尔街日报》接下来发表的另一篇署名吴迪(Dee Woo)的文章,则讲得更露骨:别的国家进口了他人的产品,必须操心自己的出口。贸易在本质上还是货物和服务之间的互通有无。美国则不同。当美国从中国拿走了老百姓辛辛苦苦的劳动果实后,并不必为中国生产实实在在的东西,而只需在家里印制钞票支付就可以了。

  这让我想起了中世纪的王室:花起钱来如同醉鬼一样挥霍无度,没钱了就借,还不起就把境内的金银币回收来重新熔铸,掺入铜铁等大量廉价金属,只需在这种劣币上写上同样的甚至更高的币值,一夜之间就变出许多钱来。这种政策,突然增加了货币的供给,在经济迅猛扩张、货币供应不足的年代,确有刺激经济之效用。但是,在更多的时刻,则造成了通货膨胀,伤害了经济发展,甚至威胁到王室本身的财政稳定。

  大量印制美元的行为则可能更糟。毕竟,中世纪王室不管怎样往金银币中掺加廉价金属,这些金属本身还是有成本的。如今的美元不过是一张纸而已,甚至有时连张纸都不用,只需在电子账目上弄出些数字、走个账就可以了。这也难怪许多美国人担心:如此下去,美元就会失去信誉,导致通货膨胀,逼高利率,摧毁经济,威胁政府财政。

也正是在这里,中国帮了美国的大忙。货币的发行仅仅是通货膨胀之一端,另一端是货币需求。当烂印钞票导致货币发行量陡增时,只要货币需求能同步上涨,就可维持供需的平衡,不至于引发恶性通货膨胀。中国为了稳定人民币的价值,以外贸盈余所换来的美元,大量购买美元的债券(包括美国的国债),不仅成为美元需求的主要支柱,也压低了美国借贷的息率——反正发放的国债要买的人有的是,自然用不着提高息率来吸引买主了。结果,美国如此放纵自己的货币政策,联邦财政和贸易背着如此大的赤字,通货膨胀的压力非常之小,债务成本也非常低。
中国购买美国债造福美国民众

  根据美国国会预算办公室自己的估计,在未来二十年内,美国的联邦债务将达到GDP的140%,这还不算入州一级的债务。如今基本破产的希腊,其债务也不过是GDP的115%。难怪《华尔街日报》指出,美国和希腊唯一的不同,是美国欠的债是以自己的货币来体现的。再怎么不行,自己印些钞票就可以还账了。更不用说,有中国帮忙,美国的债务就更好办了。

  这些不是说说而已,对老百姓的生活有着真实的影响。我们一家住在波士顿地区,去年突然读到联储开始购入大量美国债务的新闻,压低了房贷息率,于是马上买了房子,房贷利率只有5.25%。当时计算:如此的金融政策,早晚会引发通货膨胀、使利率弹上来。现在要赶紧锁定低利率。谁知道,一年下来,房贷的利率越来越低,导致我两次重新贷款,把利率压到了3.375%。即使如此,利率还继续跌,甚至可以用3.2%以下的利率,就能拿到三十年的房贷。屈指算一下,支付3.2%的利率和支付7%的利率相比,偿还房贷一个月就能给我们这样的家庭省下数百美元!这一切,没有中国力挺美国国债是不可能的。毫无疑问,我们挣的是美国的工资,享受的是中国的福利。

  如果人民币大幅度升值、中国的外贸盈余随即缩水,中国手头就没有富裕的钱收购美国的国债了。这就大大增加了美国的借贷成本。想想看,7000亿美元的刺激经济计划,多是借来的钱。以3%的利率借,一年要支付210亿美元的利息。如果以6%的利率借,一年的利息就是420亿美元,翻了一倍。不仅如此,利率一高,美国人就买不起房子。作为经济主动力的中小企业,就会被贷款的高利率所压垮。

  这并不是说美国的经济毫无前途。相反,笔者认为从长时段看,美国经济前途光明。比如,能够低息借贷,就是一国体制信誉的明证。但是,目前美国的经济处于最为艰难的时刻,必须负债经营。减低债务成本,是走出这一艰难时刻的关键。在这方面,中国给美国提供了巨大的福利。在这种情况下,美国压人民币升值未免有些太不领情。反而是中国方面需要想想:给美国提供了如此巨大的福利,是否是以牺牲中国老百姓的福利为代价?

  这也是会见了温家宝总理的摩根士丹利亚洲区主席史蒂芬·罗奇(Stephen S. Roach)在《纽约时报》上撰文的要旨:中美贸易的不平衡,表面上是币值问题,实际上则根植于以下的事实:中国的储蓄率,达到全国收入的54%,是世界主要经济体中最高的。但消费占GDP的比例,则仅为36%,是世界主要经济体中最低的。相比之下,美国长期维持着接近零点的储蓄率,消费则占GDP的70%,比中国几乎高了一倍。中国人挣了钱不花,美国人还没挣钱就花,这当然会出现美国到中国买东西、中国不从美国买东西的局面。因此,他提出中国要大力进行社会保障性投资。只有当老百姓在社会经济上有了基本的安全感,才肯把存的钱拿出来花。而当他们开始花钱时,自然会购买美国货。这样,两国的贸易就会趋于平衡。

  当中国的消费者开始花钱时,是否一定就买美国的东西,还需市场的检验。不过,此论对于中国内需不足的问题,确实击中了要害。试想,去医院要红包,孩子上学要赞助,生活中不可预测的事情太多,谁敢不存钱呢?在这种状态下,中产阶级再庞大,内需也很难拉动。不久前地方政府为了拉动内需,协同开发商鼓噪出"买房爱国论"来,结果怎样?房价一涨,老百姓就更要存钱造窝了。

  凯恩斯当年就讲过,政府把钱用于内政建设,即使有些判断失误,但修的桥、建的路、盖的学校还都在那里,不管怎么没效率,还是在使本国经济受益。如果把钱全用来购买国外的债务,一旦失算,则真是血本无归。如今中国大量的外汇盈余,是老百姓的血汗钱。把这钱往哪里投,这要看政府究竟是对滥发美元的山姆大叔有信心、还是对用双手创造了史无前例的经济奇迹的本国老百姓有信心。

作者是美国波士顿萨福克(Suffolk)大学历史系副教授


----------
发件人: Koh, S N 许昌业 <tinkoh@yahoo.com>
主题: 回复: Revisiting China's 'Empty City' of Ordos
收件人: "Wey Ling tan" <tanwl48@hotmail.com>
日期: 2010年11月24日,周三,下午7:49


Who is right ?
Who is left ?
http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2010/05/12/revisiting-chinas-empty-city-of-ordos/

I dun know as I would like to visit Ordos too as I saw the link about
ordos, China in the previous article ... Ha ha

Saturday, October 2, 2010

Can I create blog via sent email tinkohsn.fine@blogger.com

If it work by sending to email tinkohsn.ecocitychina@blogger.com and
tinkohsn.fine@blogger.com ?

the-great-class-divide-in-singapore

http://sg.yfittopostblog.com/2010/10/01/the-great-class-divide-in-singapore/

By Raju Gopalakrishnan, Reuters




SINGAPORE - Along a sun-splashed cobblestone street in central Singapore, coatless bankers with loosened ties quaff imported beers in a neighbourhood of gaily painted shophouses called Duxton Hill.



The scene is almost European. And for long-time residents of this Southeast Asian city-state at the crossroads of some of the world’s busiest shipping lanes, a bit bemusing. Just a couple of years ago late-night revellers used to tumble out of ill-lit pubs and grimy, illicit brothels on Duxton Hill.



The transformation is a microcosm of the reinventions Singapore has undergone to keep an island with almost no resources and roughly the size of New York City competitive in a neighbourhood of fast-growing emerging markets.



Boutique funds, advisory firms and brokerages are putting down roots in a revamped Duxton Hill, where opium and gambling dens run by Chinese triad gangs flourished last century.



Singapore has attracted hundreds of such firms in the past decade, lured by its light-touch registration requirements and relatively benign regulatory climate, even as Switzerland, the world’s leading wealth manager, gets tougher on bank secrecy.



“Our vision of this place is the Singapore version of London’s West End,” said Ed Peter, 47, a Swiss-born fund manager who has been buying up shophouses in Duxton Hill.



The neighbourhood, in truth, bears little resemblance to London’s theatre district, but it’s also a far cry from its shady past.



“It’s going upmarket. It’s cool. It’s funky,” said Peter, speaking effusively at his office in a three-storey building which housed an Elvis impersonator bar just two years ago. “You’ve got half the financial community here.”



Next door, the raunchy Aristocats pub closed shop a few months ago, providing space for Daun Consulting, a private equity adviser, to expand from its upper-level offices.



Peter, Deutsche Bank’s head of asset management for Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa before setting up his own firm in Singapore, manages about $650 million .



The squeaky clean city of 5.1 million, nicknamed the “nanny state” for its propensity for micromanagement, is fast emerging as one of the world’s hottest destinations for wealth — and the wealthy, who now have casinos and theme parks for play, and seaside mansions and penthouses to stay.



The Monetary Authority of Singapore at end-2009 — the most in Asia and up about 40 percent from a year ago.



The Boston Consulting Group estimates private banks alone in Singapore manage about $500 billion in assets. The numbers are dwarfed by the estimated $2 trillion in private wealth managed in Switzerland, but the growth in Singapore is startling, wealth managers say.



“In the last 10-12 years I’ve seen Singapore really take a leadership role in changing the landscape of the wealth management industry,” says Deepak Sharma, chairman of Citi Private Bank.



“The regulatory environment in Singapore is one of the finest. It has one of the best standards in the world, but at the same time, it is consultative. It engages the industry.”



GO EAST YOUNG MAN



The big players, including Swiss giants UBS AG and Credit Suisse who have a global stranglehold on private wealth management, are among those looking East. UBS, usually chary about its plans, says it will hire 400 new staffers in the Asia-Pacific region in the next few years.



Credit Suisse said net new assets from clients in Asia climbed to 11.5 billion Swiss francs in 2009 from 8.4 billion in 2008. In the first six months of this year, net new assets came in at 7.1 billion Swiss francs.



Morgan Stanley plans to double its Asia headcount in wealth management over the next three years, largely focussing on the top end of the market.



JPMorgan Chase & Co plans to triple its private banking assets in Asia over the next five years and plans to increase its headcount in the region by 40 percent over the current 400, a company spokesman in New York said this week.



“I believe Singapore will be the true private banking hub,” said Massimo Hilber, managing partner at private Swiss bank Marcuard who, like Peter, has an office on Duxton Hill. “All the big players are here, and the smaller players like us. You have to be here.”



Why Singapore?



First, assets held by Asia-Pacific’s high net worth individuals – people owning more than $1 million excluding home, collectibles and durables – surged 31 percent in 2009 to $9.7 trillion, overtaking Europe, according to CapGemini/Merrill Lynch.



Second, high net-worth individuals seeking high-return investments are turning to emerging markets. Accordingly, portfolios of such individuals included 22 percent in Asia-Pacific investments in 2009, up from 19 percent in 2008, and will soon overtake Europe, the CapGemini study says.



Many of these changes are focussed on Singapore, which is at the crossroads of new wealth being created in China, India and Indonesia, some of the fastest growing economies in the world.



Singapore, which has the world’s highest concentration of millionaires, is poised to grow its own economy 13-15 percent this year, possibly the fastest rate in the world.



Hong Kong is Asia’s other big financial centre, but tends to focus on investment banking and deal-making in China rather than in the management of private wealth, bankers say.



“Hong Kong probably makes great business sense from an investment banker perspective, but I don’t think it has invested as much in itself in creating a place for families to live,” says Nick Pollard, Asia chief executive of private banker RBS Coutts.



“What Singapore has done very well is that it has almost created a whole infrastructure, not just a place to work, but also a place to live, a place to educate your children, a place to have great fun.”



FINE CITY



Stuffy. Staid. A “fine city” where every minor transgression attracts a fine. Where the sale of chewing gum is banned, and caning is prescribed for offences such as vandalism.



That was, and in some cases still is, Singapore.



But about five years ago, the government launched a concerted effort to change the image. Two casinos sprang up this year at a cost of about $11 billion in a city where gambling had been banned. It’s the only country in the world where the Formula One Grand Prix is held at night.



Singapore impeccably conducted its third F1 race on September 26, with Fernando Alonso winning on a balmy tropical night, driving his Ferrari through 61 laps around the city’s business district.



Top music acts including Mariah Carey, Sean Kingston, Chris Daughtry and Adam Lambert performed at different areas around the circuit. Some of the jet-setting crowd partied after the race at a newly opened rooftop bar at the $5.3 billion Marina Bay Sands casino resort, built by Las Vegas Sands on reclaimed land around the mouth of the Singapore River.



Sentosa island, just offshore Singapore, is being redeveloped as a home for the seriously wealthy, with golf clubs, a sailing marina and sea-facing bungalows priced at $20 million and more. Genting Singapore’s Resorts World casino and Universal Studios theme park opened in February, raking in S$503.5 million in the first three months.



“Rebranding Singapore as a global city and tourism hub fits in very well with its natural advantage, which is its strategic location in the centre of Southeast Asia and good transportation links,” said Kit Wei Zheng, a Citigroup economist.



The aim is simple. Make the city more attractive for high-end foreign talent and wealth. Turn tourism into a money spinner. Focus on services as manufacturing shifts to lower-cost countries in the region. And make it easy for foreigners to work.



It is the latest incarnation of a city that emerged from British colonial rule in the 1960s as a gritty port town. Founding father Lee Kuan Yew and his People’s Action Party — dressed in trademark white shirts and pants — set out to scrub the city clean of corruption in all its manifestations.



By the 1970s, the port had become one of the world’s busiest and was soon complemented by the opening of top-ranked Changi international airport.



By the 1980s, Singapore was a regional manufacturing hub, particularly for electronics. Then it reinvented itself as a financial hub, and by the 1990s was one of the world’s leading centres for foreign exchange trading. A decade ago, the PAP patriarchs began building an education and bio-tech hub.



NUMBER 10



The common denominator for each Singapore incarnation has been to make it easy to do business. Be the fastest shipper, the most proficient manufacturer, the state with the least red tape.



For the Singapore financial industry, that comes from what they call “Number 10″. That’s 10 Shenton Way, not Downing Street but the address represents an institution similarly powerful — the headquarters of MAS, the central bank.



“The regulatory environment is fair as opposed to arbitrary, random and difficult,” says Peter, the fund manager. “The rule of law is incredibly important. This is probably the best-managed country on the planet. It’s managed in a pro-active business-friendly way.”



Funds with less than 30 institutional investors can set up shop without a licence from MAS. While MAS is set to introduce tighter rules next year, Singapore remains one of the easiest jurisdictions for funds to begin operations.



But as regulation is tightened in Europe and the United States following the 2008 financial crisis, and Switzerland responds to concerns about its bank secrecy laws, Singapore, too, has come under the spotlight.



In November, Singapore was taken off the OECD “grey list” of nations not implementing international disclosure standards, but has yet to sign a tax treaty with the United States.



“The business model for private bankers is going to change — they can no longer tell customers just to put their money in Singapore and they will make sure no one ever knows about it,” said Edmund Leow, principal at law firm Baker & McKenzie, Wong & Leow.



“Instead, bankers are already marketing themselves as providing the best advice on how to legitimately minimize the amount of money their customers have to pay in tax.



“This is a global trend. I think Singapore is doing what most other countries are doing and shouldn’t be disadvantaged compared with other wealth management centres.”



RISKS OF REINVENTIONS



Singapore’s seismic reinventions were possible because the government nipped any political opposition in the bud and voters who have seen their per capita incomes grow seven-fold over the years were not inclined to grumble much.



But as Singapore undergoes its latest manifestation as a “global city”, with an ever-mounting proportion of foreign residents crowding the roads and competing for space and jobs, the government is having to soothe escalating criticism from the “heartland”, the sprawl of government housing blocks in the interior of the island where much of the citizenry lives.



Take, for example, Pipit Road, where a public housing compound is set amid factories and warehouses. People there live in tiny one-room apartments and are among the least well-off in Singapore.



Elderly residents shuffle along through corridors to the open area at the ground level, many with vacant stares.



“Look at my life. Do you think I have the time?”, said Seet Siew Buay, a 49-year-old woman when asked if she had seen the casino resorts or heard of the F1 race. “I have to look after them,” she said pointing to a 26-year-old son with learning and speech disabilities and an unemployed common-law husband.



They subsist on the S$300 given to the son each month in welfare, and Wong’s savings from his days as a carpenter. Singapore households earn an average income of S$7,440 a month, according to government statistics, but the bottom 20 percent earn only S$1,274.



There is some anger in the Pipit Road housing block at what is seen as the headlong rush to attract foreign investment and wealth.



“The bloody government will get the money,” said a middle-aged man, who called himself Jack. “We will get nothing. But somehow we still vote for them.”



Having a super-rich pool of foreigners in the city poses the risk of accentuating social tensions. Already, housing prices are rising faster than in the rest of the region. Porsches, Jaguars and Ferraris flash by in the streets. The number of international schools in the city catering mostly to foreigners has risen five-fold in the last decade or so.



The number of overseas workers — mostly for menial and blue collar jobs — has also risen rapidly to around 1.8 million, a figure that also includes foreigners who have become permanent residents. That means one in three people in Singapore is a foreigner, one of the highest such proportions in the world outside the Middle East.



Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong addressed those rising concerns in his August 9 National Day speech saying that without an inflow of workers to make up for “the shortage of workers and the “shortfall of babies in our population”, the economy and society would stagnate.



“I understand Singaporeans’ concerns about taking in so many foreign workers and immigrants. Some of us wonder: Will it change the ethos of our society? Will it mean more competition for us at work, or for our children in schools? Will the new arrivals strike roots here? Can they adjust to us, and we to them? These are valid concerns which we must address.”



One way to ensure some trickle-down effect from Singapore’s rapid growth is on public spending.



The government plans to spend $44 billion alone in the next decade on extending the commuter rail network to cope with a population projected to grow another 25 percent in the next few years following a 25 percent increase the past decade.



“There is a certain degree of discontent, but it is not brewing over and spilling out into unrest,” said Gerald Giam, an executive councilor of the opposition Workers’ Party. “It is something we need to keep a watch on.”



ST. JACK



Over at Duxton Hill, it’s getting to evening and executives are winding their way home, some hailing a cab, one or two clambering onto bicycles.



It’s still a ribald place around the edges. Some of the old bars still operate. In a few corners, one can almost imagine Jack Flowers, the protagonist of Paul Theroux’s novel “St. Jack” about Singapore in the 1960s, rifling his deck of porno cards in a seedy shophouse doorway and asking a tourist: “Can I get you anything? Anything at all you need?”



For Peter, the fund manager, Singapore has what he needs.



“This place works,” he says, strolling down the cobbled street on Duxton Hill. “Take a look at the airport. In how many countries in the world do you find your luggage on the carousel when you come out? In Geneva, you wait 25 minutes. In the US of A, you worry, will your bags show up?”



Peter, who worked in private banking in Europe and Hong Kong before setting up in Singapore in 2005, is also involved in a chain of wine shops in Singapore, and vineyards in Australia.



On Singapore’s social tensions, he becomes reflective and says: “It’s a new risk that’s worth watching. Is it a big risk? No.” Then reverting to his natural ebullience, he says: “This place has the potential to be Monaco and Luxembourg, and Geneva or even London.”

Friday, March 12, 2010

[fine] (final)financial freedom

This is my fifth Blog

After I read my friend blog
http://www.logimex.blogspot.com/

I decided to create this blog to record start of my financial freedom

I was too slow in this area
I can not book the http://www.finafree.blogspot.com/
so I have to settle with http://www.finefree.blogspot.com/

A letter difference but hope it can create a big different in my life

Next I need to add Adsense to my blog.

Then I need to build up the content of my blog.

Any financial lobang, I am dedicate this to learn, build and earn financial wealth (can be $ or knowledge)

Any suggestions will be welcome

I believe the more you share and donate
The more you will receive both in return eventually

(Heard few great man say so, If you reach that level
do just give me five cents worth of thought)

Let achieve that together

Cheers !